Get your health question answered instantly from our pool of 18000+ doctors from over 80 specialties

139 Doctors Online
Doctor Image
Dr. Andrew Rynne

Family Physician

Exp 50 years

I will be looking into your question and guiding you through the process. Please write your question below.

Is diagnostic system needed in psychiatry?

Answered by
Dr. Jonas Sundarakumar


Practicing since :2003

Answered : 2190 Questions

Posted on Thu, 27 Dec 2012 in Mental Health
Question: I just want to know your thoughts….

•     Is there value in keeping some diagnostic system? Why or why not?
•     If you believe that there is value in keeping some diagnostic system, what would it consist of?
o     Would it look like the DSM-IV-TR or something different?
o     If different, what would the features be?
Answered by Dr. Jonas Sundarakumar 18 hours later

Well, this is a debatable question - whether a diagnostic system is needed in psychiatry or not...

I would think that it is necessary and would like to put forth the following reasons for the same:

1) It offers a SYSTEMATIC way to approach a case. We know that for most psychiatric illnesses, the etiology is multi-factorial and multiple issues like social and psychological issues are involved; hence, having a systematic diagnostic system will ensure that all areas are explored systematically, and nothing is missed out.

2) It ensures UNIFORMITY and RELIABILITY in diagnosis. Having a standard diagnostic system ensures that clinicians all over the world have a common, universal yardstick for identifying psychiatric disorders. For example, if a patient is diagnosed to have a particular psychiatric disorder by one doctor, then subsequently even if he has to see another doctor, the diagnosis will be easily understood by everyone - because there is a uniform diagnostic system. Even if this patient is seen in a different part of the world, that doctor will be able to clearly understand the patient's diagnosis.

3) Having specific and well-defined criteria improves the ACCURACY of the diagnosis. For example, the diagnostic criteria established in the DSM and ICD have been formulated after extensive research, analysis and trials. So, clinical diagnoses made using such scientifically proven criteria makes the diagnosis precise and accurate.

4) Having clear diagnostic criteria and check-lists, it makes it EASY for clinicians, even non-psychiatrists, to easily identify psychiatric disorders. For example, if a person has "five criteria for two weeks", then a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder can be made. This removes any ambiguity or difficulty in the diagnosis.

5) The diagnostic categories also incorporate clear-cut subtypes, specifiers and severity indicators. Severity indicators (mild, moderate, severe) help the clinician make treatment plans according to the severity, as well as monitor progress. Additional subtypes signifying remission (e.g. partial remission or complete remission) are an added advantage while following up patients on treatment.

6) When it comes to research, a proper diagnostic system is extremely useful. Any kind of study like incidence, prevalence and other epidemiological studies or interventional studies like RCTs will not be possible without clearly established diagnostic criteria.

A diagnostic system like the DSM-IV-TR is a good choice, but there are still a few drawbacks, which could be improved:

- We know that many psychiatric disorders exist in a continuum. Having a strictly categorical approach to diagnosis may have a risk of under- or over- diagnosing disorders. So, I would propose that a more slightly more dimensional approach would help in understanding a patients problems better.

- The diagnostic system should be more culturally-sensitive. For example, in many cultures, people may not be open about expressing psychological symptoms. This is more true in the Asian countries, where people express their distress as somatic symptoms, rather than as psychological symptoms. For example, depression may not present with obvious low mood or decreased interest, but with multiple vague somatic symptoms and socio-ooccupational dysfunction. So, if these people are evaluated with the DSM criteria, many may not fulfill the criteria for MDD, but still they would be suffering from depression.

- By having strict diagnostic catergories, clinicials may have a tendency to give some diagnosic labelto each and every person who comes in distress. For example, if a person has a overwhelming stress, which he has difficulty coping with it, he has to be given a diagnostic label of an "adjustment disorder" or "post-traumatic stress disorder". My arguement is that when we know that severe stress can naturally be overwhelming and cause coping difficuliies to anyone, why should the person be branded as having "disorder"? So, the diagnostic system should be sensitive to normal emotional reactions and emotional difficulties which can be natural in certain situations, and not "pathologize" every problem into a "disorder"

So, in conclusion, I would say that though it is essential to have a diagnostic system, for more accurate, uniform and reliable diagnosis, yet it should be culturally appropriate, sensitive to normal and situational variations in human behaviour and emotions, and have a more dimensional approach - thereby looking at the person as a whole and fosus on his /her distress, rather than just trying to push him / her under some diagnostic category.

- Dr. Jonas Sundarakumar
Consultant Psychiatrist
Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Chakravarthy Mazumdar

The User accepted the expert's answer

Share on
Question is related to
Diseases and Conditions ,   ,  

Recent questions on  Adjustment disorder

doctor1 MD

I am dipressed because of my wife not listening and creating fight everyday in home. it is affecting my son. not able to think of diverse now. what to do?

doctor1 MD

I think I am depressed and need help. I have been overwhelmed by sadness, deep disappointment and think od

doctor1 MD

I am sleeping way too much from past 2-3 months and feeling extreme pressure in work life. Also I am feeling demotivated and getting irritated over everything very frequently. Any solution to overcome these problems?

doctor1 MD

If I have been diagnosed with Adjustment disorder, and I know the stressor connected to the first occurance of anxiety and other symptoms, will or should removal of the stressor environment lead to a cure of the disorder? The symptoms have been present for over 6 months now, but removal of the stressor is complicated - it would involve leaving my spouse who recently decided she is gay and we have three young children. I need to know if leaving her will be the only way to step forward.

doctor1 MD

I was involved in a car accident on 06/12/09 and the other driver was very abusive and I thought they were going to run me over and try and get away. I saw a physiatrist through the insurance and he advised me to see a counsellor. He stated that I had an Adjustment disorder however I am getting CBT and she has diagnosed me with PTSD. I do not know what to do and I feel that it is more of a hindrance in my recovery

doctor1 MD

i have been taking prodep 40mg(2+0+0) and Lithosun sr 400mg(1+0+1) for two weeks. I am experiencing various side effects like insomnia, frequent sweating, fatigue, dizziness etc which were present when i went depressed due to breaking up of relation. i find no progress though taking the drugs. i want to stop this. would it be right decision?

doctor1 MD

Hi Doctor my wife start taking SALIPAX 20 we took her to the psycologost yesterday he said tak afternoon one tablet, she has a problem in office her boss said he wats to marry her becoz of that she got problem from today i stop her to go to office does this medecin bring her back normal