Question: what do these reports indicate?

what do these reports indicate?

Thank you. This is helpful. When it says endo lining thickened at 11, it could just indicate normal thickening for where I am in my cycle? There’s nothing in the report that indicates that a problem has already been diagnosed (other than unusual bleeding which is a wait and see)?

Thank you. This is helpful. When it says endo lining thickened at 11, it could just indicate normal thickening for where I am in my cycle? There’s nothing in the report that indicates that a problem has already been diagnosed (other than unusual bleeding which is a wait and see)?

And can this lining be normal with FSH level?

Even though FSH is low, is it possible I still could be in perimenopause and irregular bleeding could be related to that? I mean I’m almost 50 and aware of changes in my hormones and periods over time.

And can this lining be normal with FSH level?

Even though FSH is low, is it possible I still could be in perimenopause and irregular bleeding could be related to that? I mean I’m almost 50 and aware of changes in my hormones and periods over time.

Thank you, so very much!!!!!

Thank you, so very much!!!!!

One more question just for peace of mind. Even though I was bleeding at time of ultrasound (but it was very light) and I didn't start was more like a normal flow until the 16th (which is obviously early), it can still be alright at 11? I'm wondering if you have extra bleeding but can still be in the luteal phase at the same time?
This is the first time in learning about all of this, and my GP made it sound like a big deal about the lining, but I hope it's because he isn't an obgyn and just a general practitioner.

Thank you again!

One more question just for peace of mind. Even though I was bleeding at time of ultrasound (but it was very light) and I didn't start was more like a normal flow until the 16th (which is obviously early), it can still be alright at 11? I'm wondering if you have extra bleeding but can still be in the luteal phase at the same time?
This is the first time in learning about all of this, and my GP made it sound like a big deal about the lining, but I hope it's because he isn't an obgyn and just a general practitioner.

Thank you again!

I should add the GP, only saw the report. The obgyn said it was normal for my cycle and 8-11 was the cutoff point of normal and I was at 11. She also said she wouldn't be concerned unless it was like 20. Since it was the first time I met her, then heard from a friend she's not a good doctor, it got me wondering about the reports plus my GP's reaction, and I started worrying.

I should add the GP, only saw the report. The obgyn said it was normal for my cycle and 8-11 was the cutoff point of normal and I was at 11. She also said she wouldn't be concerned unless it was like 20. Since it was the first time I met her, then heard from a friend she's not a good doctor, it got me wondering about the reports plus my GP's reaction, and I started worrying.

My bleeding has ceased. Just slight spotting. I have pressure feeling in my vagina towards the front. I'm wondering if the use of tampons (in this case more tampons then I've ever used and many dry towards the end of the bleeding) could cause a type of irritation resulting in this sensation.

I had a vaginal ultrasound last week, as you know. Would a prolapse show up on a vaginal ultrasound if they weren't particularly looking for that? Is that something they would just notice?

Thanks again so much for your help,
XXXXXXX

My bleeding has ceased. Just slight spotting. I have pressure feeling in my vagina towards the front. I'm wondering if the use of tampons (in this case more tampons then I've ever used and many dry towards the end of the bleeding) could cause a type of irritation resulting in this sensation.

I had a vaginal ultrasound last week, as you know. Would a prolapse show up on a vaginal ultrasound if they weren't particularly looking for that? Is that something they would just notice?

Thanks again so much for your help,
XXXXXXX

Thank you for your patience with my anxiety over this.

The gynecologist I who performed the tests said it was within normal limits. I went to her randomly because the doctor I had been seeing was out on leave. I didn't feel great about this new doctor.

So the report was faxed to my GP who is a general doctor and a man. He seemed very concerned with the lining and said it was borderline. He said something about in postmenopausal women (he knows I'm not), the lining should only be at a certain level and that mine was thick. This didn't make any sense to me because I know it can change over the cycle, but since I was bleeding thought maybe it should be thinner. I was really concerned that he saw the report and maybe the new doctor didn't tell me everything.

I sent the report to my former women's doctor (also not a gynecologist but works only with women). I found out she was back from leave. I only spoke with her through her receptionist, but her reaction was weird too. She brushed me off back to the gynecologist after seeing the report.

I've been super paranoid that there's something on the report that was communicated to me by the initial doctor.

But you really don't see anything indicative of an issue (other than bleeding which is hopefully due to peri even though FSH says I'm not peri--but I'm pretty sure I am cause I'm 50 and have had changes)? The lining measurements, size of uterus, etc. seem fine to you?

I apologize for repeating questions, but it's reassuring to know the reports don't indicate something I don't know about that is serious.

Thanks again. Your responses help me to get some peace of mind through all of this.

Thank you for your patience with my anxiety over this.

The gynecologist I who performed the tests said it was within normal limits. I went to her randomly because the doctor I had been seeing was out on leave. I didn't feel great about this new doctor.

So the report was faxed to my GP who is a general doctor and a man. He seemed very concerned with the lining and said it was borderline. He said something about in postmenopausal women (he knows I'm not), the lining should only be at a certain level and that mine was thick. This didn't make any sense to me because I know it can change over the cycle, but since I was bleeding thought maybe it should be thinner. I was really concerned that he saw the report and maybe the new doctor didn't tell me everything.

I sent the report to my former women's doctor (also not a gynecologist but works only with women). I found out she was back from leave. I only spoke with her through her receptionist, but her reaction was weird too. She brushed me off back to the gynecologist after seeing the report.

I've been super paranoid that there's something on the report that was communicated to me by the initial doctor.

But you really don't see anything indicative of an issue (other than bleeding which is hopefully due to peri even though FSH says I'm not peri--but I'm pretty sure I am cause I'm 50 and have had changes)? The lining measurements, size of uterus, etc. seem fine to you?

I apologize for repeating questions, but it's reassuring to know the reports don't indicate something I don't know about that is serious.

Thanks again. Your responses help me to get some peace of mind through all of this.