Hi,I am Dr. Prabhakar Koregol (Cardiologist). I will be looking into your question and guiding you through the process. Please write your question below.
77 Years. Diagnsoed With Atrial Fibrillation. Very Active, Healthy Lifestyle, No Other Complaints. Suggested Warfarine. Necessary Medication?
I have been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. I am 77 have a very active lifestyle, a veggy diet and do not smoke or take alcohol. No blood pressure or cholesterol problems. Dr has suggested warfarine but am reluctant to start this, as I know it has side affects which cause other difficulties. Are there other ways of tackling this health issue please?
True, warfarin is a double-edged sword... However, it is necessary in Atrial fibrillation to prevent/reduce the incidence of the major consequence – embolism, which could be dangerous or debilitating. If the rhythm control can be achieved (Electro Physiologic Study & Ablation), this is not needed... If not, it has to be taken. There are a few alternatives – costly / cumbersome / not such time tested / and so on.... Discuss with your Cardiologist / Electro Physiologist
Take care Wishing speedy recovery God bless Good luck
I find this answer helpful
1 user finds this helpful
1 Doctor agrees with this answer
You found this answer helpful
Note: For further queries related to coronary artery disease and prevention, click here.
Disclaimer: These answers are for your information only and not intended to replace your relationship with your treating physician.
This is a short, free answer.
For a more detailed, immediate answer, try our premium service
[Sample answer]
We use cookies in order to offer you most relevant experience and using this website you acknowledge that you have already read and understood our
Privacy Policy
77 Years. Diagnsoed With Atrial Fibrillation. Very Active, Healthy Lifestyle, No Other Complaints. Suggested Warfarine. Necessary Medication?
Hi friend, Welcome to Health Care Magic True, warfarin is a double-edged sword... However, it is necessary in Atrial fibrillation to prevent/reduce the incidence of the major consequence – embolism, which could be dangerous or debilitating. If the rhythm control can be achieved (Electro Physiologic Study & Ablation), this is not needed... If not, it has to be taken. There are a few alternatives – costly / cumbersome / not such time tested / and so on.... Discuss with your Cardiologist / Electro Physiologist Take care Wishing speedy recovery God bless Good luck