Hi, I have just had a CT scan with the following findings . lrnrcal Notes: PrevioL:s disc prolaose and cerr.ical disc repLacem.ent for review. F rndings: Comparison is made tc, the most recent CT from a3/al/2a73 Craniocervical junction is normal. There fs exaggeration of cervical curvature. C2/C3: Disc degenerative disease with shallow central drsc bulge but rrc ceniraf canal st-enosis. 1{rId narrowing of the exit neural f o::amen but no lmpingement cf the exrtrng nerve roots , Moderate f acet I o,rnl- ciegeneration on the Ief t noted. C3/C4: Disc degenerative disease with disc osteophyte complex indenting the thecal sac with indentation on the cord but no hrgh grade canal stenosis. Na::rovring of the exit neurai foramen noted bilateralLy worse on Lhe rrghl- srde wi,th potential impingemert of the exiting rrght C4 nerr.e rcot. Face1, I oint degenerat-ion noted on the right side. C4/C5: Retrolisr. hesis of C4lC5 appears stable when compareci to previo,rs examination with significant disr- degenerative disease ancl Cisc osl,eophyte complex causing indentation of the cord and flattening of the --ord. There is afso bilateral foraminal stenosis wrth imprngement of the exiting C5 nerrre roots hrorse on the rrght side. Thrs rs aLso st-able. C5/C6: Nor-e is made of C5/6 cervical disc cage::eplacemerit. This appears trr be aporopriateiy ai igned but there is a well 619f i ned lucencv ln-,zolr.ing the anter.osuperior endplate of C6 anci thls rs -1ikely post surgical wrth part cf the ctisc protr:r:ding anterioriy into the prel,e:.tebral sof t tissue. No abnor:mal collectrcn or periosteal reaction is seen. There is however bony foi:aminal stenosis bilater:alIy wcrse on the ieft side from uncorrertebral osteophyte with irkely impingement of Lhe eritrnq reft C6 nerve root. C6/C.1 : Disc degenerative clisease wi th or sc o-qteophyte cornpl ex indenting the thecal sac. There is narro:u rng of the exit- neural f cramen but nc def rnrt-e impingement of the exit.Lng nerrre roots is seen.