Question: Hello - I am a middle class white female who had a sexual encounter with another middle class white make well over 2 years ago. About 2 weeks after the encounter I did get chlamydia and have been in fear ever since that I might have contracted something more serious like HIV.

I finally broke down about 1 year and a few months after my potential exposure and took an oraquick at home test and I saw the saliva start to travel up after 3-5 minutes and it passed the t and I received a bright red mark on the control line which I was relieved to see. I waited another 3 minutes or so and didn't see any change so I panicked and threw the test away - which leads to my first question about the oraquick test. After having been possible exposed for well over a year would the test line have shown up before the control like or within the same minute if it was really positive?

Fast forward and I have currently been with my boyfriend in a monogamous relationship for over 2 years and we have had un protected sex numerous times both on and off my period (blood interaction). He had a western blot test at around the same time I took my at home oraquick so about 6 months since we had started having un protected sex and his test came back negative for everything - my next question is are his results relatively indicative of what mine would be?

Third and final I have had a few general cbc counts with differential since then and all my results have come back on the higher end of normal - would this support a negative result.

I am just wondering after all of that what my possible risk would still be.

My question was if he tested negative does that support that I am also negative?

Also on the oraquick test, I know it says wait 20 minutes before you read the final result. It was well after a year following the encounter so would this make the results appear more quickly assuming the t line is below the c wouldn't it light up first if it was going to be positive?