Is it safe to do physical activities after having heart stroke?
No added risk.
I read your question carefully and I understand your concern.
Physical activity is very important after stroke, improves heart function and lipid control as well as improving/preserving strength and balance. Of course it is tailored according to the individual's disability left after the stroke.
In your mother's case it seems there has been no period of prolonged inactivity and she has very soon resumed normal routine without any important disability. In that case there are no particular physical activities to avoid, bending over doesn't put her in any added risk so she can continue her usual routine. There aren't any other exercise to avoid as long as she does those without any extreme exertion.
I remain at your disposal for further questions.
the stroke is that when I read on the internet it says there
is a relatively high percentage that she will have a second one.
The only risk factor she has is age. When I read that % of risk
is that with or without treatment. She is on medication so does
make the risk much lower, or is she just at high risk regardless
since she had the first stroke? Thanks and I will rate immediately!!
I wouldn't say that age is her only risk factor at this point. A previous stroke itself qualifies as a risk factor, that's what the material you read meant for a higher percentage of having a second one. Also looking at previous exchanges you mention abnormalities in her lipid panel, that is also a risk factor for stroke.
Also as my colleague Dr Saghafi suggested one can't say to have excluded a heart related risk factor. Looking at her lesions on MRI they look to have an embolic origin, meaning they came from somewhere else, and since neck vessels were studied by ultrasound and were considered normal, one can say that there is a strong chance of that remote source being the heart. At times there are heart arrhythmias which are paroxysmal, meaning they are triggered abruptly and can end in a matter of minutes. Because they are transitory they can be missed on a routine EKG, but they carry nevertheless the potential for creating a clot in the heart which then can enter the circulation and cause a stroke elsewhere. That's why Dr Saghafi suggested 30 day EKG monitoring (through a portable device) which would increase the chances of detecting such a transient arrhythmia. It doesn't necessarily have to be 30 day monitoring, it usually is started with 24h, then one week and if those are negative 30 day devices. Nowadays there are implantable devices which can be used for 3 years, but they are still new and very expensive, not available everywhere.
So what I mean to say is that there might be other risk factors which haven't been detected.
As for what the treatment does, it is reduce that risk, generally speaking it reduces the risk by 25-30%, there is no treatment to completely prevent a second stroke I am sorry, I wish there were. There are also anticoagulant drugs like Warfarin, Dabigatran, Apixaban. If the origin was in the heart they confer a greater risk reduction and benefit than antiagregants (like aspirin and plavix), but that has to be confirmed by tests.
Feel free to ask further questions, no hurry about the rating, only when you're sure you're done with the questions.
necessary for the heart with the echocardiogram and ekg. She
told her she did not think it was necessary that she see a neurologist
because he would do nothing more than she is doing with the Plavix
and aspirin. She did not want to give her a referral. However, it
sounds like she need additional heart testing. It is kind of an
I understand your situation. I don't want to push judgments. I live in a country which is not exactly well off and in the public service often EKG and echocardiogram is what the stroke patients get as well. Perhaps there are availability issues where you live as well, although would've imagined in the US (where you seem to live) at least a 24 hour Holter EKG would have been routine everywhere.
At the end of the day Plavix or Aspirine could well be what she'll need, your physician could be proven right, but to be sure and exclude the necessity of anticoagulants I think a closer look at the heart is necessary considering that MRI report. Also a statin should be added if not done already, not only for her lipid panel abnormalities but because it has been proven to have beneficial effects on blood vessel walls.
On a side note the combination of Plavix and Aspirin together for stroke prevention is not recommended for over three months as it confers no extra benefit to one of them alone, only adds the risk of hemorrhagic side effects, so after three months at most I recommend to continue only one of the two.
I hope to have been of help.
The User accepted the expert's answer
Get personalised answers from verified doctor in minutes across 80+ specialties
- Heart and stroke lottery winners
- Is it safe to have a baby after having a stroke
- Stroke and heart attack simultaneously
- Symptom of a heart stroke
- Stroke recovery after massive stroke
- Coronary heart disease and stroke
- Moms heart rate too high after stroke
- Is marijuana safe to smoke after a stroke
- Is a stroke or heart attack curable
- Stroke and drink after stroke
- Suggest treatment congenital fusion of l4-l5
- What causes transient ischemic attack?
- What causes tingly numbness in arm and intermittent burning sensation?
- Does epoxy lining in water pipes cause neurological symptoms?
- What causes loss of taste and smell?
- What causes memory loss?
- Does Mirapex ER have a generic drug?
- What does dizziness and chest pain along with back pain and headache...
- What causes seizures with history of arterial venevous malformations?
- What casues recurring headaches?