Get your Health question answered in 3 easy steps
A Doctor will be with you shortly
Ask a Doctor Now
196 Doctors are Online

Mammogram showed breast tissues composed of scattered fibroglandular densities. Does this mean cancer?

User rating for this question
Very Good
Answered by
Practicing since : 1999
Answered : 1515 Questions
I have been taking my mammogram every year and every year it has come back normal. This past week, I took it again and they want me to take it again because the left breast tissues is composed of scattered fibroglandular densities. In the central aspect, middle third of the left breast, there is a low-density mass. Does this mean cancer?
Posted Sun, 13 Oct 2013 in Breast Cancer
Answered by Dr. Timothy Raichle 15 minutes later
Brief Answer:
Hello, I would be happy to help you!

Detailed Answer:
No, this does not mean that you have cancer. The mammogram is a "screening" test and there are fair number of false-positive results. Think of it this way - in order to catch EVERYONE with breast cancer, there are going to be a large number of 'false-alarms'. While you cannot rule out breast cancer without a 'diagnostic test' which usually involved additional, more focuses views of the area in question, and possibly biopsies, I would not go into this thinking that you have breast cancer unless proven otherwise.

Does this make sense? I hope that it helps.
Above answer was peer-reviewed by
Follow-up: Mammogram showed breast tissues composed of scattered fibroglandular densities. Does this mean cancer? 10 minutes later
But based on what the diagnosis is right now, could it be breast cancer? I am terrified.
Answered by Dr. Timothy Raichle 1 hour later
Brief Answer:
It cannot be ruled out yet, but...

Detailed Answer:
Here is some more specific data regarding the PRELIMINARY finding in your scan (quoting from a reputable source):

"The most specific mammographic feature of malignancy is a spiculated focal mass (which you do not have). Of note, the DENSITY of a non-calcified mass is a significant factor in predicting malignancy. Seventy percent of masses with high density were malignant, and 22 percent of masses with low density were malignant in one study."

So based on the non-specific findings that you describe, and the LACK of calcifications / spiculations, I would place your risk of breast cancer at 1 in 5 at the WORST. So think about it this way - if there were 100 of you in a room, at most 20 of you would have breast cancer.

I hope that this helps, please let me know!
Above answer was peer-reviewed by
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Question is related to
Diseases and Conditions
Lab Tests

The user accepted the expert's answer

Ask an Oncologist

© Ebix, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
All the information, content and live chat provided on the site is intended to be for informational purposes only, and not a substitute for professional or medical advice. You should always speak with your doctor before you follow anything that you read on this website. Any health question asked on this site will be visible to the people who browse this site. Hence, the user assumes the responsibility not to divulge any personally identifiable information in the question. Use of this site is subject to our Terms & Conditions
Already Rated.
Your rating:

Ask a Doctor