HealthCareMagic is now Ask A Doctor - 24x7 | https://www.askadoctor24x7.com

question-icon

Have HBP. Prescribed Medicine For AF. Should I Continue Medicine Or Go Through Electric Shock Treatment?

default
Posted on Wed, 27 Feb 2013
Question: my wife aged 57 + suffering from high blood pressure last 14yrs BP still ranging beteen 156/94 to 140/74 pulse 78 to 56 ,most of the time 56-64.recently diagnosed suffering with AF and doctor prescribed to take dilzem sr 90 with other medicine Telema AM ,Telema 40,Zolfresh, GSTAB.but when i consulted other cardiologist the suggested to take Paradox a medicine for blood thinning with continuing medicine deleting Dilzem sr 90 and they also advised for TEE test and Electric shock treatment.now pl advise what should i do - should continue medicine deleting Dilzem or with dilzem or should go to electric shock treatment and is it safe. though apparently no sign of heart problem as in case of blockage are mentioned .Now heart palpitation is there . Any precaution should be taken.
doctor
Answered by Dr. Anantharamakrishnan (1 hour later)
Hi friend,
Welcome to Health Care Magic

There are several interconnected issues.
The best person to solve will be the one handling the case.
However, some general points can be suggested.

It is wise to have TEE – to exclude thrombus (clot) in LA (Left Atrium)

Embolism (thrombus moving out) is the major threat in Atrial Fibrillation (AF).
So, anticoagulation – unless specifically contraindicated – is generally given.

It is necessary to tackle the arrhythmia
RHYTHM CONTROL is the primary aim. Especially, if the onset is recent.
A shock may help to revert to normal rhythm. It may revert – especially, if the atrium is large or diseased...
These are advanced techniques of increasing complexity – Electro Physiological Studies (EPS) > it resembles angio – a catheter is put inside the heart / electrical activity recorded / source and spread of irregularity isolated or ablated and so on... Though the test is the gold standard, it is INVASIVE and has a risk (though minimal). This super-speciality expert is called ELECTRO-PHYSIOLOGIST. The treating doctor may suggest them depending on need, based on his assessment of the situation.

When rate control is not feasible or in cases of recurrence, RATE CONTROL is aimed at. Diltiazem is useful in in this regard, as also pressure control.

Ischemia is possible – in the setting of long standing Blood pressure and age / and it is not always symptomatic. Coronary angiography is the gold standard and can be done at the same time as EPS.

To sum up – There are quite a few technical issues involved and the decision should be done by the treating cardiologist. Seeing different doctors may end up in same medicines in different names and forms and interaction. The best option may be to admit her in a super speciality Tertiary Care Centre / investigate / treat.

Take care
Wishing speedy recovery
God bless
Good luck
Note: For further queries related to coronary artery disease and prevention, click here.

Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Chakravarthy Mazumdar
doctor
Answered by
Dr.
Dr. Anantharamakrishnan

Cardiologist

Practicing since :1966

Answered : 4505 Questions

premium_optimized

The User accepted the expert's answer

Share on

Get personalised answers from verified doctor in minutes across 80+ specialties

159 Doctors Online

By proceeding, I accept the Terms and Conditions

HCM Blog Instant Access to Doctors
HCM Blog Questions Answered
HCM Blog Satisfaction
Have HBP. Prescribed Medicine For AF. Should I Continue Medicine Or Go Through Electric Shock Treatment?

Hi friend,
Welcome to Health Care Magic

There are several interconnected issues.
The best person to solve will be the one handling the case.
However, some general points can be suggested.

It is wise to have TEE – to exclude thrombus (clot) in LA (Left Atrium)

Embolism (thrombus moving out) is the major threat in Atrial Fibrillation (AF).
So, anticoagulation – unless specifically contraindicated – is generally given.

It is necessary to tackle the arrhythmia
RHYTHM CONTROL is the primary aim. Especially, if the onset is recent.
A shock may help to revert to normal rhythm. It may revert – especially, if the atrium is large or diseased...
These are advanced techniques of increasing complexity – Electro Physiological Studies (EPS) > it resembles angio – a catheter is put inside the heart / electrical activity recorded / source and spread of irregularity isolated or ablated and so on... Though the test is the gold standard, it is INVASIVE and has a risk (though minimal). This super-speciality expert is called ELECTRO-PHYSIOLOGIST. The treating doctor may suggest them depending on need, based on his assessment of the situation.

When rate control is not feasible or in cases of recurrence, RATE CONTROL is aimed at. Diltiazem is useful in in this regard, as also pressure control.

Ischemia is possible – in the setting of long standing Blood pressure and age / and it is not always symptomatic. Coronary angiography is the gold standard and can be done at the same time as EPS.

To sum up – There are quite a few technical issues involved and the decision should be done by the treating cardiologist. Seeing different doctors may end up in same medicines in different names and forms and interaction. The best option may be to admit her in a super speciality Tertiary Care Centre / investigate / treat.

Take care
Wishing speedy recovery
God bless
Good luck